Yes a cd i.
Equivalent bitrate of vinyl.
The amplitude is the only information explicitly stored in the sample and it is typically stored.
Right but when people do the digital transfers of vinyl there s still a standard more or less bitrate for digital conversion so i should have probably clarified.
People who complain about the fact a digital recording is quantized don t understand signal processing.
A cd is 16 bit this is due to the fact that cd s have and offer better dynamic range.
Vinyl can still push music to the limits of its dynamic range 55 70db but it often shies away from doing so in order to maintain sound quality.
When comparing bitrate or the amount of data transferred per second high resolution audio s bitrate 9 216 kbps is nearly seven times higher than that of cds 1 411 kbps and almost 29 times higher than that of mp3s 320 kbps.
There are several reasons at least one of them valid.
In some ways it s the audio equivalent of driving a ford pilot.
The math has been done at to where they did say that vinyl records are the equivalent to 13 bit digital audio.
Sonically vinyl has both.
The vinyl lp is a format based on technology that hasn t evolved much over the last six decades.
Digital superiority technically speaking cd is a generally superior medium.
I was a little uncertain because tape s quality is more suspect than vinyl or cd.
Cds and vinyl records are both audio storage and playback formats based on rotating discs from different times in music history the cd audio is digitally encoded and read by a laser while analog vinyl audio is physically read by a needle.
That s why snare drums cymbal splashes and other loud instruments have so much more punch in vinyl recordings.
I ll probably do the lossless transfer anyway though.
Comparing compact discs cds to vinyl or gramophone records is the musical equivalent of comparing digital photography with film photography.